Most agencies did not choose to fragment their security model.
Application teams build controls into their code. Cloud teams build separate policy into the infrastructure. So neither layer travels well. Not when a workload moves. Not when an audit starts. Not when a deployment goes tactical.
And every move turns into a security project. Someone rebuilds the controls from scratch, right when the timeline is tightest.
In his section, our CEO Chris Holmes breaks down what replaces the pattern.
One portable policy layer, decoupled from both the application and the infrastructure. Running on FIPS 140-3 validated encryption (CMVP #5191). Enforced the same way, cloud, on-prem, or tactical.
“Processes that used to take months now take days, in some cases hours, because the security controls are repeatable and far easier to validate.”
Chris Holmes
Chief Executive Officer
What you will learn:
- What bolt-on security costs you when a workload moves.
- How a portable policy layer ends the rebuild cycle across cloud, on-prem, and tactical environments.
- How one Department of War platform achieved 62% faster compliance audits..
- Why continuous evidence beats a point-in-time snapshot for Zero Trust and cATO.
This is one part of a larger platform. See the Mission Application Security Pipeline for the complete picture.